United States v. Mary Ann Grice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution may be ordered for uncharged conduct if the uncharged conduct possesses the same modus operandi as the charged conduct
• finding that the fraud for which restitution was sought was conducted by the same modus operandi
• affirming an award of restitution for the full fraud scheme even though the defendant only pled guilty to part
• noting the use of an identical modus operandi to commit the offenses for which restitution was sought and the offense of conviction
• “[Permitting restitution under the MVRA for related, but uncharged mail fraud conduct occurring prior to and continuing past the MVRA’s enactment is consistent with the text of the statute and related authority.” (emphasis added)
• “The MVRA’s definition of victim is identical [to the VWPA’s], and we interpret it as we have the definition under the VWPA.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).