United States v. Marvin Hayutin and Leon Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice to defendant despite contact between alternates and jury because “nothing in the trial record ... indicates that there was any communication between the regular and alternate jurors”
• finding no prejudice to defendant despite contact between alternates and jury because \nothing in the trial record ... indicates that there was any communication between the regular and alternate jurors\
• and as pointed out above

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).