United States v. Marvin Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a witness’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment creates a conflict between his right against self-incrimination and the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process
• “As far as we can tell, this court has never found that the failure to grant immunity to a defense witness deprived the defendant of due process.”
• “[Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE)] Rule 403 applies to all evidence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).