United States v. Martorano, George, A/K/A Cowboy. Appeal of George Martorano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that recusal motions are insufficient if based on “possibilities and unsubstantiated allegations” (internal quotations omitted)
• stating that a recusal motion must be based on “objective facts,” not mere “possibilities” and “unsubstantiated allegations”
• stating that a recusal motion must be based 4 on “objective facts,” not mere “possibilities” and “unsubstantiated allegations”
• explaining that recusal is not required when based on mere “possibilities” and “unsubstantiated allegations”
• stating that a recusal motion must be based on “objective facts,” not “unsubstantiated allegations”
• explaining that recusal is not required when based on mere “possibilities” and “unsubstantiated allegations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).