· 12/17/1971
United States v. Martinson
Citations
- 21 C.M.A. 109
- 21 USCMA 109
- 44 C.M.R. 163
- 1971 CMA LEXIS 527
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that even though the agency “applied the wrong standard, we must affirm the decision if. under the proper standard the agency would have reached the same result”
- stating that even though the agency “applied the wrong standard, we must affirm the decision if under the proper standard the agency would have reached the same result”
- applying Chenery principle to the ruling of the Board as successor to the Federal Employee Appeals Authority
- applying Chenery principle to the ruling of the Board as successor to the Federal Employee Appeals Authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dakden, Ferguson, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.