Skip to main content
· 12/17/1971

United States v. Martinson

Citations

  • 21 C.M.A. 109
  • 21 USCMA 109
  • 44 C.M.R. 163
  • 1971 CMA LEXIS 527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that even though the agency “applied the wrong standard, we must affirm the decision if. under the proper standard the agency would have reached the same result”
  • stating that even though the agency “applied the wrong standard, we must affirm the decision if under the proper standard the agency would have reached the same result”
  • applying Chenery principle to the ruling of the Board as successor to the Federal Employee Appeals Authority
  • applying Chenery principle to the ruling of the Board as successor to the Federal Employee Appeals Authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dakden, Ferguson, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.