United States v. Martini (Cassesse)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the § 3583(h) subtraction principle is not applicable to defendants who are eligible for lifetime supervision
• noting that “Section 3553(c) requires no specific formulas or incantations; rather, the length 16 and detail required of a district court’s explanation varies according to the circumstances”
• explaining that where sentence imposed upon revocation of supervision “is within the recommended range, compliance with the statutory requirements can be minimal” and that section 3553(c) is satisfied if district court’s statements (1
• upholding lifetime supervised release where court adequately explained reasoning and defendant had been convicted of new criminal offenses multiple times while on supervised release
• clarifying that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) provides that “[t]he length of [supervised release] shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release”
• clarifying that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) provides that “[t]he length of [supervised release] shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).