United States v. Martinez-Vidaurri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defamation claims did not require a heightened pleading standard
• “there is no special pleading requirement in federal court for a defamation action”
• “Properly applied, the ‘doctrine’ dispels the idea that serial unusual events can be dismissed as coincidence, and raises suspicion calling for further investigation. But to support the inference of concert of action or conspiracy, more is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).