Skip to main content
· 1/20/2010

United States v. Martinez-Melgar

Citations

  • 591 F.3d 733
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1170
  • 2010 WL 184025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we may reverse a factual finding “only . . . where the factual determination[] [is] not supported by substantial evidence” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \sentencing courts routinely rely on similar printouts of computerized records\ and may do so when determining whether an admission occurred rather than the \substantive content\ of that admission
  • “sentencing courts routinely rely on similar printouts of computerized records” and may do so when determining whether an admission occurred rather than the “substantive content” of that admission
  • “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”
  • “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”
  • “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shedd, Duncan, Ellis, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.