· 1/20/2010
United States v. Martinez-Melgar
Citations
- 591 F.3d 733
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1170
- 2010 WL 184025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we may reverse a factual finding “only . . . where the factual determination[] [is] not supported by substantial evidence” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
- \sentencing courts routinely rely on similar printouts of computerized records\ and may do so when determining whether an admission occurred rather than the \substantive content\ of that admission
- “sentencing courts routinely rely on similar printouts of computerized records” and may do so when determining whether an admission occurred rather than the “substantive content” of that admission
- “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”
- “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”
- “[C]lear error occurs when a district court’s factual findings are against the clear weight of the evidence considered as a whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shedd, Duncan, Ellis, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.