United States v. Martin, Troy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the existence of well-established sealing protocols contributed to the believability of the Government’s explanation of operator error
• witness’s denial of the existence of a cooperation agreement “does not end the matter”
• “The fact that a few of those tapes were defective was unknown until the Government’s investigation nearly was completed, and the sealing error certainly did not interfere with the statutory objectives of ensuring judicial oversight and non-tampering with wiretap recordings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).