United States v. Martin Steve Chavira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the agent's suspicions were reasonably aroused when the defendant stated that he was en route to Oklahoma to buy cars but was driving alone and did not appear to be carrying a tow bar
• concluding that the agent’s suspicions were reasonably aroused when the defendant stated that he was en route to Oklahoma to buy ears but was driving alone and did not appear to be carrying a tow bar
• stating that the facts gave reasonable inference to support the officer’s belief that suspicious circumstances existed
• stating that the facts gave reasonable inference to support the officer's belief that suspicious circumstances existed
• stating suspicious circumstances to allow continued detention past routine inquiry
• stating suspicious circumstances to allow continued detention past routine inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).