United States v. Martin Sigillito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding any procedural error harmless because it did not affect the Guidelines range
• noting harmless error review is permissible for procedural errors, such as miscalculation of a defendant’s offense level
• finding no conflict where two prosecutors who voluntarily recused from a case because of a supervisory prosecutor’s conflict nevertheless participated in the case
• noting that “Libretti continues to control”
• “[E]xposure of the witness’s motivation for testifying is an important aspect in the constitutionally protected right of cross-examination.”
• “[E]xclusion of evidence” for violations of Rule 41(f)(1) “is required only when the error prejudices the defendant, or the police act in reckless disregard to the proper procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).