United States v. Martin Ole Gjerde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding certain Rule 801(d)(2)(E) factors as necessarily satisfied by preponderance where court had already found the relevant facts proven beyond reasonable doubt
• statements were not “in furtherance of’ the conspiracy, where they were made several years after its objective had been attained and were not made in an effort to conceal an on-going conspiracy
• “At the time of Gjerde’s trial, Richard Field was not available as a witness. He had pled guilty to the conspiracy and had asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self- incrimination pending his appeal.”
• same elements as in Keltner
• attorney engaged in billing fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).