Skip to main content
· 5/31/2002

United States v. Martin Jorge Esparza

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 1052
  • 59 Fed. R. Serv. 180
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10303
  • 2002 WL 1077683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to remand for more specific findings where the evidence in the record clearly indicated that the defendant's testimony was intentionally false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Riley, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.