Skip to main content
· 6/9/1995

United States v. Martin Estrada-Plata

Citations

  • 57 F.3d 757
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4427
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 7444
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14274
  • 1995 WL 346098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward is unreviewable unless the decision was based on a mistaken belief that the court had no authority to depart
  • “[T]he decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[T]here is no constitutional right to a plea bargain, and the decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (citation omitted)
  • “[T]here is MOORE v. CZERNIAK 9507 no constitutional right to a plea bargain, and the decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (citation omitted)
  • describing the fast-track program of the Southern District of California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Hug, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.