· 6/9/1995
United States v. Martin Estrada-Plata
Citations
- 57 F.3d 757
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4427
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 7444
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14274
- 1995 WL 346098
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward is unreviewable unless the decision was based on a mistaken belief that the court had no authority to depart
- “[T]he decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[T]here is no constitutional right to a plea bargain, and the decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (citation omitted)
- “[T]here is MOORE v. CZERNIAK 9507 no constitutional right to a plea bargain, and the decision whether to offer a plea bargain is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.” (citation omitted)
- describing the fast-track program of the Southern District of California
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Hug, Hawkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.