Skip to main content
· 8/19/1982

United States v. Martin Diaz

Citations

  • 685 F.2d 252
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the government’s showing of consent was not fatally flawed by its failure to call an informant as a witness because a police officer testified regarding consent
  • concluding the voluntariness of an informant’s consent was not diminished by the fact that informant agreed to the monitoring and tape recording of his conversations because he hoped such cooperation would favorably influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office or the judge
  • testimony of law enforcement officer that informant agreed to telephone the defendant knowing the conversation would be monitored and recorded was sufficient to establish consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Lay, McMILLIAN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.