United States v. Martin C. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an individual who incidentally receives, but knowingly retains, child pornography has sufficient mens rea for possession of child pornography but not receipt
• finding vaginal intercourse between a prepubescent girl and an adult male sadistic
• rejecting double counting argument of a defendant convicted of knowingly receiving materials 12 No. 03-2530 depicting a child engaged in “sexually explicit conduct,” pur- suant to 18 U.S.C. § 2252, as two-point enhancement, pur- suant to § 2G2.2(b)(1
• video of adult male engaging in vaginal intercourse with five to eight-year-old child was “violent” for the purposes of U.S.S.G. 2G2.2(b)(3), because it would have been painful for the child
• “The Supreme Court has held that . . . § 2252(a)(2) includes a scienter requirement, and therefore encompasses only situations in which the defendant knows that the material he is receiving depicts minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).