Skip to main content
· 3/4/1993

United States v. Martin Allen Johnson

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 941
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 2902
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1574
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3548
  • 1993 WL 54549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant must demonstrate cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of an insufficiency-of-the- evidence claim under § 2255
  • rejecting Rule 35 motion because defendant “argue[d] he should not have been convicted . . . .”
  • rejecting Rule 35 motion because defendant “argue[d] he should not have been convicted . . . .”
  • declining to address appellant's entrapment by estoppel argument because affirmative defense was not raised in the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.