United States v. Martici L. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining de novo review because “we believe that the district court based its ultimate 5 determination—that [the defendant was not entitled to the guideline reduction]—on factual grounds rather than on the allegedly erroneous” legal conclusion
• “[T]he government may defeat the defense of entrapment with proof of predisposition to commit the crime.”
• “Whether the defendant has accepted responsibility is a factual question, and a district court’s determination in this regard should not be disturbed unless it is without foundation.” (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).