United States v. Marquette Scott Walterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in a case where we remanded for limited resentencing that \[a] defendant does not receive a second chance to support an argument he failed to support in a first appeal simply because he is resentenced\ (quotation omitted)
• declining, in a direct criminal appeal after remand, to address a new argument based upon Blakely, which had not been advanced in the first sentencing proceeding, the first appeal, or in his second sentencing proceeding
• in appeal following limited remand, refusing to consider issues outside of scope of remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).