United States v. Markum Lynn Fitzhugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Against the backdrop of Scarborough, the inclusion in section 922(g)(1) of interstate commerce language almost identical to that found in section 1202(a) suggests intent to continue the former statute’s broad reach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).