United States v. Markrud
Citations
- 5 Alaska 323
Syllabus
<p>Bail <&wkey;43—Criminal Law—Rape.</p> <p>The defendant was held to answer on the charge of carnally knowing an Indian girl under 16 years of age. The committing magistrate refused to admit him to bail, and defendant appealed to the district court judge to fix bail bond. The statute (section 2314) provides that the defendant cannot be admitted to bail where the offense charged is rape, and “where the proof or presumption of his guilt is evident or strong.” HelH, the proofs offered in this case are not considered of such character as to justify refusal of bail. Defendant admitted to bail.</p> <p><S=»See same topic & KEY-NTJMBER. in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- insofar as it held that the appropriations doctrine had abrogated the common-law riparian right, Hathaway was overruled in Wasserburger v. Coffee, 180 Neb. 149, 141 N.W.2d 738, 743 [1966]
- insofar as it held that the appropriations doctrine had abrogated the common-law riparian right, Hathaway was overruled in Wasserburger v. Coffee, 180 Neb. 149, 141 N.W.2d 738, 743 [1966]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jennings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.