Eleventh Circuit· 8/3/2015
United States v. Mark Willner, M.D.
Citations
- 795 F.3d 1297
- 2015 WL 4604312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court’s error in allowing a witness to give expert testimony was harmless because of “the overwhelming evidence of the [defendants’] guilt as charged in the indictment”
- stating deliberate ignorance may establish knowledge of the unlawful purpose of the conspiracy
- “Anyone can state what a document says or read from it if it has been admitted into evidence, and permitting this testimony was not error.”
- “One circumstance in which courts find constitutional errors harmless beyond a reasonable doubt is when the evidence of the defendant’s guilt is ‘so overwhelming.’”
- “When there is overwhelming evidence of a defendant’s guilt . . . non-constitutional error is harmless.”
- reversing a conspiracy conviction for lack of proof of knowledge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Jill, Pryor, Tjoflat
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. David Ming PonEleventh Circuit· 2020-06-29· cited 49×
- United States v. Roger BergmanEleventh Circuit· 2017-03-24· cited 30×
- United States v. Doris CrabtreeEleventh Circuit· 2018-01-03· cited 20×
- United States v. Arman AbovyanEleventh Circuit· 2021-02-22· cited 17×
- United States v. Frank BellEleventh Circuit· 2024-08-14· cited 11×
- United States v. Vanja AbreuEleventh Circuit· 2020-10-01· cited 5×
- United States v. PontzFirst Circuit· 2025-03-14· cited 3×
- United States v. AbercrombieM.D. Alabama· 2019-05-28· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- United States v. BrandonFirst Circuit· 1994-01-31· cited 453×
- United States v. Ronald Keith BrownEleventh Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 372×
- United States v. Terence George KellyEleventh Circuit· 1989-09-29· cited 276×
- United States v. James P. HornadayEleventh Circuit· 2004-12-13· cited 182×
- United States v. Raul Trujillo, Francisco Nelson FuentesEleventh Circuit· 1998-10-05· cited 154×
- United States v. Reynaldo DiazSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-29· cited 115×
- United States v. WoodardEleventh Circuit· 2008-06-27· cited 114×
- United States v. MedinaEleventh Circuit· 2007-05-11· cited 105×
- United States v. Mohan Mankani, Kenneth R. Norris, Joseph Fortin, Peter Christopher MacFarlane Sally EdithSecond Circuit· 1984-06-20· cited 103×
- United States v. Leroy Warshawsky (93-1345) Ira Warshawsky (93-1346) and Ted Warshawsky (93-1473)Sixth Circuit· 1994-06-23· cited 83×
- United States v. GuzmanEleventh Circuit· 1999-02-12· cited 78×
- United States v. Thomas ConstantFifth Circuit· 1974-10-04· cited 30×
- United States v. GrahamEleventh Circuit· 2011-06-14· cited 29×
- United States v. Investment Enterprises, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 23×
- United States v. Arthur L. Herzberg and Gerald M. BarnesFifth Circuit· 1977-09-12· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.