United States v. Mark William Cothran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \§ 35(b)'s language closely tracks that of 49 U.S.C. § 46507\
• explaining and then adopting the Eighth Circuit’s approach in United States v. Osborne, 164 F.3d 434 (8th Cir. 1999)
• explaining and then adopting the Eighth Circuit’s approach in United States v. Osborne, 164 F.3d 434 (8th Cir. 1999)
• refusing to reconcile “inconsistencies” in testimony because “witness credibility [is] an area peculiarly within the jury’s domain”
• possessing dangerous weapon guideline suffi- ciently analogous—though not most analogous—to a crime of conveying false information and threats about carrying explo- sives on an airplane
• possessing dangerous weapon guideline suffi- ciently analogous—though not most analogous—to a crime of conveying false information and threats about carrying explo- sives on an airplane

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).