United States v. Mark White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the words ‘combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed’ adequately set forth the charge of conspiracy”
• making clear that the indictment must be sufficient to allow a defendant “ ‘to plead double jeopardy as a bar to a future prosecution’”
• finding an indictment sufficient in part because of references to relevant criminal statutes
• finding an indictment sufficient in part because of references to relevant criminal statutes
• “As a general rule, a prosecutor may not express a personal opinion about a defendant’s veracity.”
• although the indictment lacked specificity concerning the exact dates of the conspiracy, it was adequate to charge the conspiracy, because it specified a conspiracy to possess and distribute a specified controlled substance in a. specified place during a specified time span

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).