United States v. Mark Spangler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even assuming that the district court’s decision to bar expert testimony was error, such error was harmless
• holding that even assuming that the district court’s decision to bar expert testimony was error, such error was harmless
• “While an honest, good-faith belief in the truth of the misrepresentations may negate intent to defraud, a good-faith belief that the victim will be repaid and will sustain no loss is no defense at all.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).