Skip to main content
· 6/14/1988

United States v. Mark Samuel Richardson

Citations

  • 849 F.2d 439
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8049
  • 1988 WL 59382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “requiring the probation officer’s physical presence during every probation search or requiring close supervision of all probation searches, would unnecessarily interfere with the twin goals of probation: rehabilitation of the probationer and protection of society”
  • decision to authorize search more important than identity of those present during its course
  • decision to authorize search more important than identity of those present during its course
  • \`The fact that police investigation of [a crime] . . . preceded the involvement of parole officials does not in itself indicate that the search was initiated by police officers.'\
  • \ 'The fact that police investigation of [a crime] . . . preceded the involvement of parole officials does not in itself indicate that the search was initiated by police officers.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hall, Schnacke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.