United States v. Mark Higgins, Thaddeus Harrison, and Orlando Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[d]isclosure even in mid-trial suffices if time remains for the defendant to make effective use of the exculpatory material”
• “Defendants who request a mistrial . . . may not use the double jeopardy clause to avoid a second trial.”
• in case where DEA agent witness inappropriately referenced a defendant’s actions after being Mirandized, district court took testimony from agent to determine if his statements had been designed to provoke a mistrial request
• in case where DEA agent witness inappropriately refer- enced a defendant’s actions after being Mirandized, district court took testimony from agent to determine if his statements had been designed to provoke a mistrial request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).