Skip to main content
· 9/19/2006

United States v. Mark Edwin Sells

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 1148
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23744
  • 2006 WL 2678015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that this limitation was first made part of our doctrine in Naugle
  • noting that all federal circuit courts of appeals have adopted doctrine and citing supporting cases
  • observing that “all federal circuits have followed the doctrine” of severability, “synonymously referring to it as ‘severability,’ ‘severance,’ ‘redaction,’ or ‘partial suppression’”
  • noting that \every federal court to consider the issue has adopted the doctrine of severance\
  • stating that “[t]otal suppression may still be required even where a part of the warrant is valid (and distinguishable) if the invalid portions so predominate the warrant that the warrant in essence authorizes ‘a general, exploratory rummaging in a person’s belongings’”
  • noting that all fed- eral circuits apply the doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Ebel, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.