United States v. Mark Allen Hallam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer may reasonably defer to the judgment of the prosecutor and the issuing judge that the affidavit provided probable cause
• holding that it was objectively reasonable for an officer to rely on the validity of a warrant where “the [officer’s] affidavit, while scant, was not so utterly lacking in facts as to render [his] belief that it established probable cause ‘entirely unreasonable.’”
• holding that it was objectively reasonable for an officer to rely on the validity of a warrant where “the [officer’s] affidavit, while scant, was not so utterly lacking in facts as to render [his] belief that it established probable cause ‘entirely unreasonable.’ ”
• holding that it was objectively reasonable for an officer to rely on the validity of a warrant where “the [officer's] affidavit, while scant, was not so utterly lacking in facts as to render [his] belief that it established probable cause ‘entirely unreasonable.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).