United States v. Marisol, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although motions to strike are disfavored, “they do serve a useful purpose by eliminating insufficient defenses and saving the time and expense which would otherwise be spent in litigating issues which would not affect the outcome of the case”
• noting that although motions to strike are disfavored, “they do serve a useful purpose by eliminating insufficient defenses and saving the time and expense which would otherwise be spent in litigating issues which would not affect the outcome of the case”
• “[T]he court finds no persuasive authority which imposes a legal duty upon the Government to mitigate damages in a CERCLA action”
• “Motions to strike are often viewed with disfavor because of their potential to be used as a dilatory tactic.”
• “[M]otions to strike are often viewed with disfavor because of their potential to be used as a dilatory tactic.”
• “[M]otions to strike are often viewed with disfavor because of their potential to be used as a dilatory tactic.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).