United States v. Mario v. Menesses, Jr., Danny Pineda Barreto and Harold Bratovich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a litigant waived an argument by failing to brief the issue, instead raising it for the first time at oral argument
• noting the government did not raise the defendant's failure to preserve its argument until oral argument and then applying the conventional sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard to the merits of the defendant’s arguments
• noting the government argued the defendant's waiver for the first time at oral argument, which would seem to indicate its failure to do so earlier had been forfeiture, rather than waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).