United States v. Mario Reeves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether failure to advise on enhanced sentencing for future criminal conduct can give rise to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
• confining the United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S. Ct. 1473, 176 L. Ed. 2d 284 [2010], to deportation cases and holding that a lawyer does not have a duty to explain the consequences of hypothetical future 13 convictions
• “Padilla is rife with indications that the Supreme Court meant to limit its scope to the context of deportation only.”
• “Padilla is rife with indications that the Supreme Court meant to limit its scope to the context of deportation only.”
• “The Supreme Court created a rule in Padilla specific to the risk of deportation[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).