Skip to main content
· 5/2/2001

United States v. Marin-Mayorga

Citations

  • 8 F. App'x 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that literal compliance with the Act wasn't necessary because the tribe didn't challenge the termination and the termination nonetheless kept the child integrated with native heritage
  • discussing existing Indian family doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.