United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Buford leads to the use of a deferential standard of review in the application of the Sentencing Guidelines under, circumstances involving fact-bound determinations
• explaining that more deference is owed where the enhancement at issue is of a “fact-specific nature”
• applying clear error review to a district court’s application of the 7 No. 19-5556, United States v. Parsons Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).