United States v. Maria Toney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “prior consistent statements in no way clarify or explain the even earlier inconsistent statements that [the witness] allegedly made,” which “would only have bolstered [her] in-court ex- culpatory statements” and thus “had no rehabilitative value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).