United States v. Marcus Rubin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where an impartial jury was finally empaneled, the need to waste peremptory challenges to eliminate jurors whom the trial court should have removed for cause cannot be the basis of a Sixth Amendment challenge
• “The process of empaneling a jury is firmly entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial 22 judge and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of this discretion.”
• “[Defendant] cannot prevail because he has not made the requisite showing that the jury eventually empaneled was not impartial. Under this court’s precedents, without such a showing his claim must fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).