United States v. Marcus Aaron Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• weighing various non-exclusive actors, including the use to which the Doyle reference was put; curative instructions, frequency of references; what party originated the reference, and weight of evidence, in determining harmless error
• decision whether error is harmless requires examination of facts, context of error, and prejudice created thereby juxtaposed against strength of evidence of guilt
• decision whether error is harmless requires examination of facts, context of error, and prejudice created thereby juxtaposed against strength of evidence of guilt
• five-point analysis for a determination of harmless Doyle error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).