United States v. Marcos-Quiroga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of a prior conviction as “both a basis for an enhanced statutory penalty ... and as the basis for a career offender guidelines enhancement” violates neither the Sixth Amendment nor the defendant’s right to a jury trial
• holding that the use of a prior conviction as “both a basis for an enhanced statutory penalty . . . and as the basis for a career offender guidelines enhancement” violates neither the Sixth Amendment nor the defendant’s right to a jury trial
• defendant satisfied the deficient- performance prong where counsel failed to advise him that he would be sentenced as a career offender
• defendant satisfied the deficient-performance prong where counsel failed to advise him that he would be sentenced as a career offender
• defendant satisfied the deficient-performance prong where counsel failed to advise him that he would be sentenced as a career offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).