United States v. Marco Flores-Alvarado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the context of relevant conduct, conspiracy liability is “generally much broader” than jointly undertaken criminal activity
• holding that, in the context of relevant conduct, conspiracy liability is “generally much broader” than jointly undertaken criminal activity
• applying Rule 32(i)(3)(B) to dispute over attribution of drug quantities
• “[T]he scope of the criminal activity jointly undertaken by the defendant . . . is not necessarily the same as the scope of the entire conspiracy, and hence relevant conduct is not necessarily the same for every participant . . . .” (emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).