United States v. Marco Damico

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that parties agreed on four interest. Thus, we decline to hold that those statements were “groups” of underlying racketeering activity
• noting that parties agreed on four \groups\ of underlying racketeering activity
• rejecting defendant’s argument that his racketeer- ing conduct was not relevant to his extortion-related conduct, for purposes of § 3B1.1(a
• convictions for extortionate extraction of street tax grouped by victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).