United States v. Marco Alvarado-Zarza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer’s mistake of law was not objectively reasonable because, in part, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had rejected the officer’s interpretation
• concluding that the officer’s mistaken interpretation of a similar Texas turn signal provision was not a reasonable mistake of law in part because (1
• holding that an officer’s mistaken reading of an unambiguous statute was not objectively reasonable
• holding that an officer’s mistaken reading of an unambiguous statute was not objectively reasonable
• recognizing that mistake of law does not apply to unambiguous statutes
• noting that reasonable suspicion can rely upon a mistake of fact if it is “objectively reasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).