Third Circuit· 6/16/2010

United States v. Marcavage

Citations

609 F.3d 264
70 A.L.R. 6th 753
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12271
2010 WL 2384839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying strict scrutiny to a content-based application of national park regulation against an anti-abortion protester in a public forum
finding that a sidewalk was not a “special enclave” despite being made of a different type of building block, and bordered by chain-linked metal bollards, because it was used as a public thoroughfare and connected to city sidewalks
construing an unclear complaint as bringing an as-applied claim where the plaintiff’s argument was “entirely dependent on the facts of th[e] case”
applying strict scrutiny to a content-based application of national park regulation against an anti-abortion protester in a public forum
suggesting that the government bears the burden
“The degree of First Amendment protection a speaker enjoys depends on the type of forum in which his expressive activity occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Hardiman, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

104 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.