United States v. Marcavage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying strict scrutiny to a content-based application of national park regulation against an anti-abortion protester in a public forum
• finding that a sidewalk was not a “special enclave” despite being made of a different type of building block, and bordered by chain-linked metal bollards, because it was used as a public thoroughfare and connected to city sidewalks
• construing an unclear complaint as bringing an as-applied claim where the plaintiff’s argument was “entirely dependent on the facts of th[e] case”
• applying strict scrutiny to a content-based application of national park regulation against an anti-abortion protester in a public forum
• suggesting that the government bears the burden
• “The degree of First Amendment protection a speaker enjoys depends on the type of forum in which his expressive activity occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).