United States v. Manuel Gunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any error in admitting extrinsic evidence was harmless in part because the court issued a limiting instruction
• noting that “[a] defendant also has constructive possession if he has the power and intention to exercise dominion or control”
• “The defendant may exercise [ ] dominion and control either directly or through others.” (citations omitted)
• because the defendants conspired to commit an armed robbery of cocaine, possession of firearms by their co-conspirator was reasonably foreseeable
• “The defendant may exercise [] dominion and control either directly or through others.” (citations omitted)
• because the defendants conspired to commit an armed robbery of cocaine, possession of firearms by their co-conspirator was reasonably foreseeable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).