United States v. Manuel Dozal, United States of America v. Rudy Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that probable cause to arrest exists if, “under the totality of circumstances,” a reasonable officer believes a crime is being committed
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to admit the defendant’s statements refusing consent to search because they were introduced “for the proper purpose of establishing dominion and control over the premises where a large part of the cocaine was found”
• finding such evidence admissible to establish the defendant's dominion and control over the property subject to the search
• noting that \asking a jury to draw adverse inferences from such a refusal may be impermissible if the testimony is not admitted as a fair response to a claim by the defendant or for some other proper purpose\
• noting that \asking a jury to draw adverse inferences from such a refusal may be impermissible if the testimony is not admitted as a fair response to a claim by the defendant or for some other proper purpose\
• noting that \asking a jury to draw adverse inferences from such a refusal may be impermissible if the testimony is not admitted as a fair response to a claim by the defendant or for some other proper purpose\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).