United States v. Mann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We review the admission of Rule 414 evidence for an abuse of discretion.”
• witness’s “testimony on direct examination” permitted “preliminary finding that a jury could reasonably find by a preponderance of the evidence that the [prior similar sexual act] occurred” even though “her initial statements about defendant’s prior acts were inconsistent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Velarde
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 91×
• United States v. Dwaun Jabbar Guidry
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 72×
• United States v. Sturm
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-03-13· cited 53×
• State v. Cuttler
  Utah Supreme Court· 2015-12-24· cited 50×
• United States v. Perrault
  Tenth Circuit· 2021-04-21· cited 13×
• United States v. Levy
  S.D. New York· 2009-01-27· cited 10×
• United States v. Sturm
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-04-04· cited 5×
• United States v. Sturm
  D. Colorado· 2008-12-11· cited 4×
• United States v. Anthony Red Elk
  Eighth Circuit· 2025-03-31· cited 4×
• United States v. Sandoval
  D. New Mexico· 2005-12-10· cited 1×
• United States v. Guidry
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-07-20
• United States v. Harjo
  Tenth Circuit· 2024-12-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Castillo
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-04-06· cited 301×
• United States v. Kerry Neil Enjady
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 196×
• United States v. Edwards
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 190×
• United States v. Guardia
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-02-02· cited 135×
• United States v. Meacham
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-06-24· cited 121×