Skip to main content
· 8/18/2005

United States v. Mandy Martinson

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 749
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17490
  • 2005 WL 1981328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we generally do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal in a reply brief
  • noting moving for judgment of acquittal insufficient to preserve claim for new trial where defendant failed to move for a new trial; reviewing claim for plain error
  • an error in a verdict form is reviewed for either abuse of discretion or plain error, depending upon whether timely objection was made, but in either case, the defendant must show both error and prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruender, Heaney, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.