United States v. Maltos-Estrada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supervisor's use of highly offensive racial slur was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to support hostile work environment claim
• noting, as to the “n word”, “[w]here such an abhorrent slur is alleged, there is no question that its use was offensive, unwelcome, and racially motivated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).