United States v. Malik Driskell, Also Known as Max Del Valle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the intent of New York law is best served by treating Youthful Offender Adjudications as adult convictions rather than juvenile adjudications
• holding that under the sentencing guidelines, a youthful offender adjudication can be considered in calculating criminal history points
• concluding that the intent of 21 New York law is best served by treating Youthful Offender Adjudications as adult convictions rather 22 than juvenile adjudications
• stating that criminal history depends on “substance” of past conviction not “statutory term affixed to it by a state court”
• stating that criminal history depends on “substance” of past conviction not “statutory term affixed to it by a state court”
• noting defendant was tried and convicted in adult court and received and served “what can be thought of-as an ‘adult’ sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).