Skip to main content
· 2/7/2002

United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)

Citations

  • 280 F.3d 1008
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1236
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1555
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1830
  • 2002 WL 187420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing use of a state definition of burglary of a residence despite federal definitions for several other categories of burglary
  • allowing use of a state definition of burglary of a residence despite federal definitions for several other categories of burglary
  • “[W]e reject the contention that tribal law should govern the admissibility of statements in federal court. Federal law governs federal proceedings.”
  • “[W]e reject the con- tention that tribal law should govern the admissibility of state- ments in federal court. Federal law governs federal proceedings.”
  • “The MCA was enacted after the [ICCA] . . . as an exception to or abrogation of the [ICCA].”
  • consider- ing suppression of evidence based on argument that confes- sion was wrongfully obtained by tribal investigators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Brunetti, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.