Skip to main content
· 6/12/1992

United States v. Malcolm Frazier

Citations

  • 971 F.2d 1076
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13398
  • 1992 WL 127713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[t]he acceptance of responsibility reduction essentially codifies the judicial practice of sentencing more leniently defendants who evidence contrition and cooperate with law enforcement authorities\
  • holding that \[t]he acceptance of responsibility reduction essentially codifies the judicial practice of sentencing more leniently defendants who evidence contrition and cooperate with law enforce- ment authorities\
  • conditioning of two point reduction on accepting responsibility for all criminal conduct does not violate fifth amendment right against self-incrimination
  • “[T]he choice confronting defendants in appellant’s position is not ‘likely to exert such pressure upon an individual as to disable him from making a free and rational choice.’ ”
  • \we fail to see how withholding the leniency offered in U.S.S.G.S 3E1.1 from those who refuse to waive their right to remain silent can be thought punitive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Luttig, Kidd, Northern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.